IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v56y2024i4p411-423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling fortification strategies for network resilience optimization: The case of immunization and mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Costa
  • Tsan Sheng Ng
  • Jidong Kang
  • Zhuochun Wu
  • Bin Su

Abstract

The ability of a system to tolerate disruptions and mitigate against malicious attacks is crucial in many applications, especially when a failure of the system can have huge economic and social consequences. The concept of system resilience has drawn increasing research and practical interest, and in this article, we propose a framework to define system resilience based on modelling of fortification strategies in the context of network interdiction problems. Specifically, we consider fortification strategies that address disruptions in two ways: immunization, where a certain disruption is not permitted to take place, and mitigation, where the disruption occurs, but is unable to impair significantly the system performance. We then propose the resilience optimization problem (RES-OPT) to maximize the capability of a system in fortifying against disruptions through immunization and mitigation strategies. The flexibility of this approach lies in that instead of assuming a fixed set of disruption scenarios, we fortify the system against as powerful an attacker as possible. In addition, we propose a cutting plane methodology to effectively solve the resulting optimization problem, and apply it to a network flow with transmission-links fortification and an electricity transmission network problem in Southern China. The results show that RES-OPT yields good quality solutions in terms of both resilience and average costs, compared to other benchmark approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Costa & Tsan Sheng Ng & Jidong Kang & Zhuochun Wu & Bin Su, 2024. "Modelling fortification strategies for network resilience optimization: The case of immunization and mitigation," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 411-423, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:56:y:2024:i:4:p:411-423
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2022.2123116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2022.2123116
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2022.2123116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:56:y:2024:i:4:p:411-423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.