IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v54y2022i4p348-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibrium analysis and coalition stability in R&D cooperation with spillovers

Author

Listed:
  • Changwen Li
  • Yong-Wu Zhou
  • Bin Cao
  • Yuanguang Zhong

Abstract

This article analyzes cost-reducing R&D cooperation by n horizontal firms, and studies two common cooperation modes with knowledge spillovers: R&D cartels (CT) and research joint ventures (RV). These firms are allowed to freely form coalitions (or alliances) among themselves to better coordinate their R&D efforts, and then compete in the production stage. We model the endogenous alliance/coalition formation between n firms given coalition structures as a two-stage game, in which the firms in the first stage choose to cooperate in R&D, and in the second stage all firms play a Cournot game in production quantity. Our results show that the coalition structure’s stability is closely affected by spillover rate and degree of R&D difficulty, number of participant firms, cooperation modes, and myopic and farsighted views. We find that the grand coalition is not always myopic stable and is farsighted stable under the CT mode with a three-firm or four-firm market, while the grand coalition is always not myopic stable but is farsighted stable under the RV mode only with a four-firm market. Moreover, we find that the conditions under which there are no myopic stable coalition structures for the RV and CT modes with regard to spillover rate and degree of R&D difficulty differ.

Suggested Citation

  • Changwen Li & Yong-Wu Zhou & Bin Cao & Yuanguang Zhong, 2022. "Equilibrium analysis and coalition stability in R&D cooperation with spillovers," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 348-362, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:54:y:2022:i:4:p:348-362
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2021.1947545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2021.1947545
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2021.1947545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:54:y:2022:i:4:p:348-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.