IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v50y2018i8p735-751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polynomial time algorithms and extended formulations for unit commitment problems

Author

Listed:
  • Yongpei Guan
  • Kai Pan
  • Kezhuo Zhou

Abstract

Recently, increasing penetration of renewable energy generation has created challenges for power system operators to perform efficient power generation daily scheduling, due to the intermittent nature of the renewable generation and discrete decisions of each generation unit. Among all aspects to be considered, a unit commitment polytope is fundamental and embedded in the models at different stages of power system planning and operations. In this article, we focus on deriving polynomial-time algorithms for the unit commitment problems with a general convex cost function and piecewise linear cost function, respectively. We refine an O(T3)$\mathcal {O}(T^3)$ time, where T represents the number of time periods, algorithm for the deterministic single-generator unit commitment problem with a general convex cost function and accordingly develop an extended formulation in a higher-dimensional space that can provide an integral solution, in which the physical meanings of the decision variables are described. This means the original problem can be solved as a convex program instead of a mixed-integer convex program. Furthermore, for the case in which the cost function is piecewise linear, by exploring the optimality conditions, we derive more efficient algorithms for both deterministic (i.e., O(T)$\mathcal {O}(T)$ time) and stochastic (i.e., O(N)$\mathcal {O}(N)$ time, where N represents the number of nodes in the stochastic scenario tree) single-generator unit commitment problems. We also develop the corresponding extended formulations for both deterministic and stochastic single-generator unit commitment problems that solve the original mixed-integer linear programs as linear programs. Similarly, physical meanings of the decision variables are explored to show the insights of the new modeling approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongpei Guan & Kai Pan & Kezhuo Zhou, 2018. "Polynomial time algorithms and extended formulations for unit commitment problems," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(8), pages 735-751, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:50:y:2018:i:8:p:735-751
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2017.1397303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2017.1397303
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2017.1397303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heng Yang & Ziliang Jin & Jianhua Wang & Yong Zhao & Hejia Wang & Weihua Xiao, 2019. "Data-Driven Stochastic Scheduling for Energy Integrated Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Jianqiu Huang & Kai Pan & Yongpei Guan, 2021. "Multistage Stochastic Power Generation Scheduling Co-Optimizing Energy and Ancillary Services," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 352-369, January.
    3. Skolfield, J. Kyle & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2022. "Operations research in optimal power flow: A guide to recent and emerging methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 387-404.
    4. Kai Pan & Ming Zhao & Chung-Lun Li & Feng Qiu, 2022. "A Polyhedral Study on Fuel-Constrained Unit Commitment," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3309-3324, November.
    5. Bernard Knueven & James Ostrowski & Jean-Paul Watson, 2020. "On Mixed-Integer Programming Formulations for the Unit Commitment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 857-876, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:50:y:2018:i:8:p:735-751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.