IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v50y2018i3p161-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of a production line operated under an echelon buffer policy

Author

Listed:
  • George Liberopoulos

Abstract

We consider a production line consisting of several machines in series separated by intermediate finite-capacity buffers. The line operates under an Echelon Buffer (EB) policy according to which each machine can store the parts that it produces in any of its downstream buffers if the next machine is occupied. If the capacities of all but the last buffer are zero, the EB policy is equivalent to constant work in process (CONWIP). To evaluate the performance of the line under the EB policy, we model it as a queueing network and we develop a method that is based on decomposing this network into as many nested segments as there are buffers and approximating each segment with a two-machine subsystem that can be analyzed in isolation. For the case where the machines have geometrically distributed processing times, we model each subsystem as a two-dimensional Markov chain that can be solved numerically. The parameters of the subsystems are determined by relationships among the flows of parts through the echelon buffers in the original system. An iterative algorithm is developed to solve these relationships. We use this method to evaluate the performance of several instances of five- and 10-machine lines including cases where the EB policy is equivalent to CONWIP. Our numerical results show that this method is highly accurate and computationally efficient. We also compare the performance of the EB policy against the performance of the traditional “installation buffer” policy according to which each machine can store the parts that it produces only in its immediate downstream buffer if the next machine is occupied.

Suggested Citation

  • George Liberopoulos, 2018. "Performance evaluation of a production line operated under an echelon buffer policy," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 161-177, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:50:y:2018:i:3:p:161-177
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2017.1390800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2017.1390800
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2017.1390800?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. George Liberopoulos, 2020. "Comparison of optimal buffer allocation in flow lines under installation buffer, echelon buffer, and CONWIP policies," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 297-365, June.
    2. Bengisu Urlu & Nesim K. Erkip, 2020. "Safety stock placement for serial systems under supply process uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 395-424, June.
    3. Kiesmüller, G.P. & Sachs, F.E., 2020. "Spare parts or buffer? How to design a transfer line with unreliable machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 121-134.
    4. Sachs, F.E. & Helber, S. & Kiesmüller, G.P., 2022. "Evaluation of Unreliable Flow Lines with Limited Buffer Capacities and Spare Part Provisioning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 544-559.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:50:y:2018:i:3:p:161-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.