IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v97y2026i2p367-397.html

“The Selectivity Divide: A Longitudinal Study of Religious Pluralism in United States Higher Education”

Author

Listed:
  • David Shuang Song
  • Ilana M. Horwitz
  • Jenny L. Small

Abstract

Institutions of higher education have a critical role in fostering religious pluralism, defined as the active engagement with religious difference. Selectivity is societally important to religious pluralism because of pluralism’s role in culturally shaping elite and economically privileged adults through higher education. This study explores how institutional selectivity is associated with students’ rhetorical and behavioral commitments to religious pluralism, addressing a major gap in the literature on diversity in higher education. We use three waves of data (2015–19) from the Interfaith Diversity Experiences and Attitudes Longitudinal Survey (IDEALS) to track these dual modes of commitment to religious pluralism. We find that students at more selective institutions demonstrate stronger rhetorical commitments to religious pluralism at the beginning of college, partially mediated by socioeconomic status, liberal political orientation, and pre-college interfaith experiences. Meanwhile, students at less selective institutions modestly increase over their undergraduate experience in these commitments, but their more elite counterparts do not. However, selectivity does not significantly predict students’ behavioral commitment to religious pluralism, as operationalized as their interfaith engagement, though across selectivity level students increase in this dimension. Our findings have important implications for how institutions might foster serious engagement with religious diversity in an increasingly polarized society.

Suggested Citation

  • David Shuang Song & Ilana M. Horwitz & Jenny L. Small, 2026. "“The Selectivity Divide: A Longitudinal Study of Religious Pluralism in United States Higher Education”," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 97(2), pages 367-397, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:97:y:2026:i:2:p:367-397
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2025.2521999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2025.2521999
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2025.2521999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:97:y:2026:i:2:p:367-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.