IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v96y2025i6p909-935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Discourse Analysis of University Responses to the Shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Feldman

Abstract

The attack on the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, PA on October 27, 2018, prompted many institutions of higher education to respond to the attack as a show of support for Jewish community members at their institution. This study engages in a Critical Discourse Analysis to determine how university leaders utilized language to discuss the shooting and how they framed Jewish identity and antisemitism in the process. Drawing on two conceptual frameworks, HebCrit and institutional speech acts as non-performatives, analysis from 26 universities revealed seven discursive practices: naming Jewish identity and antisemitism; categorizing Jewish identity; “All Lives Matter”ing the Tree of Life shooting; grieving, mourning, thoughts & prayers; offering support; employing institutional values statements; and finally, defining institutional leadership’s role. The article concludes with implications for future research as well as implications for university leaders seeking to write institutional statements and create a more inclusive environment for Jewish people.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Feldman, 2025. "A Critical Discourse Analysis of University Responses to the Shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 96(6), pages 909-935, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:96:y:2025:i:6:p:909-935
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2024.2424130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2024.2424130
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2024.2424130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:96:y:2025:i:6:p:909-935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.