IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v96y2025i6p1086-1113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Student Beliefs and Choices Related to Cross-Enrollment to Square Practice with Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Michael S. Hill
  • Rachel B. Baker
  • Elizabeth S. Park
  • Loris Fagioli

Abstract

College students make repeated course enrollment decisions, which are informed by their beliefs and preferences about course and institutional characteristics. Cross-enrollment, an enrollment pattern in which community college students simultaneously take a class at a 4-year college or university while still enrolled in classes at their community college, poses unique considerations. This article examines community college students’ beliefs and preferences related to enrollment on their home campus and at a nearby four-year college. We surveyed 671 transfer-intending students at three California community colleges about their beliefs around the costs and benefits of course-taking at their home community college and a neighboring university. We also conducted a choice-based conjoint experiment to understand how students weigh various factors related to selecting courses at both institutions. We find that community college students’ course enrollment decisions at their home campus are driven by cost and anticipated workload, combined with concerns about academic preparation and access to support. However, concerns about administrative burdens associated with transferring credit between institutions drive students’ decisions about course enrollment at a neighboring university. These findings are important for administrators planning course offerings and policymakers seeking to increase rates of cross-enrollment.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael S. Hill & Rachel B. Baker & Elizabeth S. Park & Loris Fagioli, 2025. "Understanding Student Beliefs and Choices Related to Cross-Enrollment to Square Practice with Theory," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 96(6), pages 1086-1113, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:96:y:2025:i:6:p:1086-1113
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2024.2422761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2024.2422761
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2024.2422761?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:96:y:2025:i:6:p:1086-1113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.