IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v96y2025i5p830-856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantity and Quality: Equity Considerations for the Funding of Categorical Programs in Community Colleges

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Wright-Kim
  • Jaime Ramirez-Mendoza
  • Rogelio Salazar

Abstract

Categorical funding is often intended to support our most historically underserved students, while also addressing financial inequities. Extant research suggests, however, that these funding streams may be equitable in intention but not in practice. Situated in a multidimensional equity framework, this study leverages descriptive budget data, funding and regulation documentation, and interviews with categorical-affiliated staff across multiple institutions within the US’s largest community college system to examine funding (in)equities of categorical funding and their potential to address persistent inequities in student access and success within higher education. Our findings suggest that in addition to trade-offs in the funding formulas themselves, contextual factors via program regulations and institutional characteristics also ultimately influence the “equitable” resourcing of these potentially high-impact programs. This study contributes to literature on higher education finance and policy, including the often-overlooked mechanism of categorical funding, and offers implications for future policy and practice, as well as opportunities for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Wright-Kim & Jaime Ramirez-Mendoza & Rogelio Salazar, 2025. "Quantity and Quality: Equity Considerations for the Funding of Categorical Programs in Community Colleges," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 96(5), pages 830-856, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:96:y:2025:i:5:p:830-856
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2024.2378649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2024.2378649
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2024.2378649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:96:y:2025:i:5:p:830-856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.