IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v92y2021i4p596-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambiguous Credentials: How Learners Use and Make Sense of Massively Open Online Courses

Author

Listed:
  • Krystal Laryea
  • Andreas Paepcke
  • Kathy Mirzaei
  • Mitchell L. Stevens

Abstract

Researchers have investigated the demography and styles of engagement of those who enroll in MOOCs but have lent little attention to how learners navigate MOOCs’ ambiguity as academic certifications. Analyzing semi-structured interviews with 60 people who devoted substantial time to at least one MOOC between 2014–2017, we find that people use MOOCs to build skills for application at work and home, build relationships, navigate life transitions, and enhance formal presentations of self, at the same time that they disagree on the meaning of MOOC completions as official academic accomplishments. Our findings build theory on the multi-dimensional character of credential prestige that can inform educational social scientists and credential providers in an increasingly complicated postsecondary ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Krystal Laryea & Andreas Paepcke & Kathy Mirzaei & Mitchell L. Stevens, 2021. "Ambiguous Credentials: How Learners Use and Make Sense of Massively Open Online Courses," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 92(4), pages 596-622, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:92:y:2021:i:4:p:596-622
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2020.1851571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2020.1851571
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2020.1851571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:92:y:2021:i:4:p:596-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.