IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugitxx/v6y2003i4p27-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Issues in Information Systems Management: A Comparative Study of Academics and Practitioners in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Daranee Pimchangthong
  • Michel Plaisent
  • Prosper Bernard

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the information systems (IS) key issues in Thailand by comparing IS academics and practitioners within the country, and by comparing Thailand as a whole with other developed and developing countries. The economic development based on GDP per capita was used to classlfj, the developed and developing countries. The Q-Sort method, a ranking technique, was used to rank the IS key issues. The data were collected through an Internet survey website. The findings show that the issue of building information technology (Ig infrastructure was projected to be the top issue over the next three to five years in Thailand. The importance ranking of IS key issues in Thailand was similar to the studies from developed countries but dlflerent than the studies from developing countries. There was a signljkant dlflerence in the importance rankings of IS key issues between academics and practitioners in Thailand. However, they were in agreement on the first and second ranking IS key issues, which were building IT infrastructure and IS strategic planning, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Daranee Pimchangthong & Michel Plaisent & Prosper Bernard, 2003. "Key Issues in Information Systems Management: A Comparative Study of Academics and Practitioners in Thailand," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 27-44, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugitxx:v:6:y:2003:i:4:p:27-44
    DOI: 10.1080/1097198X.2003.10856359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1097198X.2003.10856359
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1097198X.2003.10856359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirchandani, Dinesh A. & Lederer, Albert L., 2008. "The impact of autonomy on information systems planning effectiveness," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 789-807, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugitxx:v:6:y:2003:i:4:p:27-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.