IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tsysxx/v44y2013i11p2166-2182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scenario aggregation for supply chain quantity-flexibility contract

Author

Listed:
  • Gitae Kim
  • Chih-Hang Wu

Abstract

In this research, we apply a scenario aggregation approach to solving the supply chain contract model formulated by two-stage stochastic programming problem. The supply chain contract can achieve the coordination between the buyer and the supplier. We formulate the stochastic programming model for a quantity-flexibility contract. The scenario aggregation method called the progressive hedging method is used to solve this problem. Experimental results show the convergence behaviour of the algorithm and the sensitivity of parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Gitae Kim & Chih-Hang Wu, 2013. "Scenario aggregation for supply chain quantity-flexibility contract," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(11), pages 2166-2182.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tsysxx:v:44:y:2013:i:11:p:2166-2182
    DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2012.702237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207721.2012.702237
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207721.2012.702237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yingxue Zhao & Tsan-Ming Choi & T. C. E. Cheng & Shouyang Wang, 2017. "Mean-risk analysis of wholesale price contracts with stochastic price-dependent demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 491-518, October.
    2. Subrata Saha, 2016. "Channel characteristics and coordination in three-echelon dual-channel supply chain," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 740-754, February.
    3. Heydari, Jafar & Govindan, Kannan & Ebrahimi Nasab, Hamid Reza & Taleizadeh, Ata Allah, 2020. "Coordination by quantity flexibility contract in a two-echelon supply chain system: Effect of outsourcing decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tsysxx:v:44:y:2013:i:11:p:2166-2182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSYS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.