IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v45y2025i5p650-671.html

Beyond necessity: a review of discretionary trips’ impact on well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Hook

Abstract

This review explores the multifaceted role of discretionary trips, or travel undertaken without obligation, such as leisure, social, or recreational trips, in enhancing objective and subjective well-being. Drawing on 61 interdisciplinary studies published between 2014 and 2024, it highlights eight key themes linking discretionary travel to well-being: social connections and belonging, emotions and experiences, environmental and urban design, trip characteristics and context, physical health, mental health, personal development and achievement, and autonomy and freedom. Findings reveal that discretionary trips contribute to physical and mental health, promote social interaction, foster personal growth, and provide opportunities for self-determination and engagement with nature. These benefits are amplified by supportive urban design, such as walkable neighbourhoods and accessible public transport. Specific populations, including women, older adults, telecommuters, and individuals with disabilities, derive significant well-being benefits from discretionary travel. The review underscores the importance of integrating discretionary travel into transport policies and urban planning to foster sustainable, inclusive, and fulfilling mobility systems. Future research should address equity in access, the influence of emerging technologies, and the long-term effects of discretionary travel on well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Hook, 2025. "Beyond necessity: a review of discretionary trips’ impact on well-being," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 650-671, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:45:y:2025:i:5:p:650-671
    DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2025.2501957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441647.2025.2501957
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441647.2025.2501957?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:45:y:2025:i:5:p:650-671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.