IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v58y2020i18p5676-5692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product line optimisation based on semiparametric choice model

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Qi
  • Xinggang Luo
  • Yang Yu
  • Jiafu Tang

Abstract

Consumer choice behaviour is important in the product line optimisation problem. The extant literature on product line optimisation is mostly based on traditional consumer choice models, such as the multinomial logit and multinomial probit models. These models either assume that the utility errors are independent from irrelevant alternatives (IIA) or are limited by complex calculation processes or pre-given, specific distributions of measuring errors. The marginal moment model (MMM), which is classified as a semiparametric choice model, does not require specific distributions of errors; thus, it can overcome the IIA shortcoming. This study focuses on the concavity of the profit functions of a product line optimisation model based on MMM. We prove that the profit function based on MMM is concave in market share under a monopoly or oligopoly. Numerical experiments show that the choice probabilities obtained from the MMM, multinomial logit, and multinomial probit models are similar although they are obtained under different assumptions. Experimental results under monopolistic, Cournot, and Bertrand competition based on MMM are compared. Some interesting managerial insights are summarised based on the sensitivity analysis of the various model parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Qi & Xinggang Luo & Yang Yu & Jiafu Tang, 2020. "Product line optimisation based on semiparametric choice model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(18), pages 5676-5692, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:58:y:2020:i:18:p:5676-5692
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1656838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2019.1656838
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2019.1656838?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:58:y:2020:i:18:p:5676-5692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.