IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v21y2023i1p197-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a contingency model of knowledge sharing: interaction between social capital and social exchange theories

Author

Listed:
  • Li Zhao
  • Brian Detlor

Abstract

This paper develops a contingency model to examine whether the impact of costs and benefits (derived from social exchange theory) are contingent upon factors related to the social context, such as norms and generalized trust (derived from social capital theory) in virtual communities. In general, the results suggest that costs negatively affected one’s intention to share knowledge, whereas benefits positively affect one’s intention to share knowledge. Particularly, while the effort of knowledge sharing has a direct effect on one’s intention to share knowledge, the effect of loss of knowledge power is contingent upon pro-sharing norms. While two intrinsic benefits (enjoyment in helping others and social affiliation) have direct effects on one’s intention to share knowledge, the impact of the extrinsic benefit (i.e., online status seeking) is contingent upon prosharing norms. Generalized trust has also the potential to moderate the impact of online status seeking on one’s intention to share knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Zhao & Brian Detlor, 2023. "Towards a contingency model of knowledge sharing: interaction between social capital and social exchange theories," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 197-209, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:21:y:2023:i:1:p:197-209
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2020.1866444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2020.1866444
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2020.1866444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:21:y:2023:i:1:p:197-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.