IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v74y2023i11p2455-2471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time uncertainty and random opinion based group decision making for demolition negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Quanbo Zha
  • Wenjuan Zhou
  • Jianping Gu

Abstract

Current research on group decision making (GDM) focuses on how to quickly reach a consensus, in which decision makers’ opinions are mainly changed by feedback suggestion, not by changing circumstances over time. In a long-term GDM problem, decision-makers may be affected by the environment to change their views. For example, real estate market prices will affect residents’ opinions in time-consuming demolition negotiations. We introduce time uncertainty to study the long-term GDM problem with random opinions following this idea. This article constructs the minimum cost and maximum utility-based consensus models in GDM with random opinion based on the time uncertainty. The optimal time of decision-making can be determined. Specifically, the real options theory is employed to study time uncertainty. Furthermore, the feasibility of the models is verified by case analysis of China’s demolition negotiation for old communities’ renewal projects, and sensitivity analyses are developed to analyse the robustness of our models. In the case analysis and sensitivity analysis, we obtain the optimal solution of models by using a genetic algorithm based on MATLABR2018b.

Suggested Citation

  • Quanbo Zha & Wenjuan Zhou & Jianping Gu, 2023. "Time uncertainty and random opinion based group decision making for demolition negotiations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(11), pages 2455-2471, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:11:p:2455-2471
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2150577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2022.2150577
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2022.2150577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:11:p:2455-2471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.