IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v72y2021i1p180-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk interval-valued three-way decisions model with regret theory and its application to project resource allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Decui Liang
  • Mingwei Wang
  • Zeshui Xu
  • Xu Chen

Abstract

Psychology of regret often affects how people work in their daily lives. Due to the effects of psychology of regret, decision-makers can make irrational decisions in the face of uncertain decision risks. As a classic model, three-way decisions (TWD) are to divide a universal set into three pair-wise disjoint regions by developing an appropriate strategy and also have been widely applied in the area of risk decision-making. However, in the existing theoretical research of TWD, few studies mention the influence of psychology of regret on risk behaviours of decision-makers. In order to expand the theories of TWD and build contacts, we have introduced the influence of psychology of regret on decision-makers’ risk behaviours into TWD with decision-theoretic rough sets (DTRS). In thisarticle, we specifically adopt regret theory to depict the decision-makers’ risk behaviours on the loss function. Regret theory as one type of generalised psychology, considers the psychological comparison between the current choice and other choices made by decision-makers. In light of the Bayesian decision procedure and a basic model of interval-valued DTRS, we reinterpret TWD and construct a new risk interval-valued TWD model. At the same time, we explore the influence of the regret behaviour to TWD by using the simulation experiment and validate the effectiveness of the new risk model. Then, we further apply the risk interval-valued TWD model to support the project resource allocation. From two different viewpoints, we establish two adjustment targets to meet the actual needs of decision-makers in project allocation, which improves our decision’s flexibility in the resource restriction. Target 1 is to minimise the utility loss of the entire field. Target 2 is to maximise the utility of the positive region in each field. Finally, a case of popular entrepreneurship of online movie is used to illustrate and validate our proposed methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Decui Liang & Mingwei Wang & Zeshui Xu & Xu Chen, 2021. "Risk interval-valued three-way decisions model with regret theory and its application to project resource allocation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 180-199, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:1:p:180-199
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1654939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2019.1654939
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2019.1654939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Song, Yongming & Li, Yanhong & Zhu, Hongli & Li, Guangxu, 2023. "A decision support model for buying battery electric vehicles considering consumer learning and psychological behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:1:p:180-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.