IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v71y2020i11p1691-1709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The pragmatic logic of OR consulting practice: Towards a foundational view

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Ormerod

Abstract

The originators of pragmatism argued that pragmatism is a way of thinking rather than a set of axioms, rules and methods. They explain how theory and logic derive from the thinking processes of everyday life, at the centre of which are inquiries. Inquiries enable us to get our thoughts clear before we take action; they are the lifeblood of every science and are, according to the pragmatists, constantly engaged in every craft, profession and art. During inquiries habits are formed, confirmed, adjusted or discarded as their operational effects are experienced. The paper, following the approach of the originators, describes the development of a method and logic of OR arrived at by articulating some of the activities I regularly engaged in during my experience of practicing OR. The result is a draft of my pragmatic method of OR. It is claimed that the resulting pragmatic method and logic in effect operationalises pragmatism in an OR context. It is concluded that there is merit in practitioners similarly deriving, and reflecting on, their pragmatic method of OR. The implications for practice, teaching, and research are discussed. Finally, the possibility of developing a foundational view of the practice of OR is briefly considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Ormerod, 2020. "The pragmatic logic of OR consulting practice: Towards a foundational view," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(11), pages 1691-1709, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:71:y:2020:i:11:p:1691-1709
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1630331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2019.1630331
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2019.1630331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pinto, Ana M.F. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Spahr, Ronald W. & Sunderman, Mark A. & Govindan, Kannan & Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, Ieva, 2021. "Analyzing blight impacts on urban areas: A multi-criteria approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Michael C. Jackson, 2023. "Rebooting the systems approach by applying the thinking of Bogdanov and the pragmatists," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 349-365, March.
    3. Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Spahr, Ronald W. & Sunderman, Mark A. & Govindan, Kannan & Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, Ieva, 2022. "Urban blight remediation strategies subject to seasonal constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(1), pages 277-288.
    4. Weck, Marina & Jackson, Eric Blake & Sihvonen, Markus & Pappel, Ingrid, 2022. "Building smart living environments for ageing societies: Decision support for cross-border e-services between Estonia and Finland," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Richard John Ormerod, 2023. "The logic of semiotics applied to mathematical and social interaction in operational research consulting practice: Towards a foundational view," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 16-42, January.
    6. Bruno M. B. Pinto & Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Ronald W. Spahr & Mark A. Sunderman & Leandro F. Pereira, 2023. "Analyzing causes of urban blight using cognitive mapping and DEMATEL," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1083-1110, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:71:y:2020:i:11:p:1691-1709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.