IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v26y2017i2p206-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflicts and complements between eastern cultures and agile methods: an empirical investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Balasubramaniam Ramesh
  • Lan Cao
  • Jongwoo Kim
  • Kannan Mohan
  • Tabitha L. James

Abstract

Agile methods have been widely adopted around the world – particularly in the Eastern world, where cultural scripts differ from that of the West from where agile methods originated. However, there is a lack of understanding of the interplay between the basic tenets of agile methods and the Eastern cultures. This understanding is crucial for the effective use of the methods in these cultures. To examine how Eastern cultural phenomena interplay with agile methods, we followed an emic approach in a multisite case study. We examined the adaptation of agile practices in organizations in China, India, and South Korea. We developed a framework describing how Eastern cultural scripts often express the collectivist response to cultural theoretical concepts and how the cultural response interacts in complementary and conflicting ways with agile methods. To explore how conflicts are mitigated, we examined the ways organizations develop ambidextrous practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Balasubramaniam Ramesh & Lan Cao & Jongwoo Kim & Kannan Mohan & Tabitha L. James, 2017. "Conflicts and complements between eastern cultures and agile methods: an empirical investigation," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 206-235, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:26:y:2017:i:2:p:206-235
    DOI: 10.1057/s41303-016-0023-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/s41303-016-0023-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41303-016-0023-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emmanouil Papagiannidis & Ida Merete Enholm & Chirstian Dremel & Patrick Mikalef & John Krogstie, 2023. "Toward AI Governance: Identifying Best Practices and Potential Barriers and Outcomes," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 123-141, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:26:y:2017:i:2:p:206-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.