IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjbaxx/v2y2019i1p74-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remedies against bias in analytics systems

Author

Listed:
  • John Steven Edwards
  • Eduardo Rodriguez

Abstract

Advances in IT offer the possibility to develop ever more complex predictive and prescriptive systems based on analytics. Organizations are beginning to rely on the outputs from these systems without inspecting them, especially if they are embedded in the organization’s operational systems. This reliance could be misplaced unethical or even illegal if the systems contain bias. Data, algorithms and machine learning methods are all potentially subject to bias. In this article we explain the ways in which bias might arise in analytics systems, present some examples, and give some suggestions as to how to prevent or reduce it. We use a framework inspired by the work of Hammond, Keeney and Raiffa on psychological traps in human decision-making. Each of these traps “translates” into a potential type of bias for an analytics-based system. Fortunately, this means that remedies to reduce bias in human decision-making also translate into potential remedies for algorithmic systems.

Suggested Citation

  • John Steven Edwards & Eduardo Rodriguez, 2019. "Remedies against bias in analytics systems," Journal of Business Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 74-87, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjbaxx:v:2:y:2019:i:1:p:74-87
    DOI: 10.1080/2573234X.2019.1633890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/2573234X.2019.1633890
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/2573234X.2019.1633890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brandt, Tobias & Wagner, Sebastian & Neumann, Dirk, 2021. "Prescriptive analytics in public-sector decision-making: A framework and insights from charging infrastructure planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 379-393.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjbaxx:v:2:y:2019:i:1:p:74-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjba .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.