IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v4y2015i3p204-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-benefit evaluation of e-health services: acceptance and value creation are interactive forces

Author

Listed:
  • Gunilla Myreteg

Abstract

Resources are limited in health care. There is a scarcity of knowledge on how to economically evaluate e-health. The present study is a review of research in this area. The article proposes a theoretical frame of reference for cost-benefit evaluation of e-health services from the vantage point of electronic health records. The basis of the evaluation needs to acknowledge the context of all relevant heterogeneous stakeholder groups. Acceptance is linked to the unique situation, as one group may perceive costs while another realizes the benefits. The model is expressed as a loop, where expected values and realized values within the processes are intricately connected to one another, evolving over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunilla Myreteg, 2015. "Cost-benefit evaluation of e-health services: acceptance and value creation are interactive forces," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 204-211, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:4:y:2015:i:3:p:204-211
    DOI: 10.1057/hs.2015.10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/hs.2015.10
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/hs.2015.10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:4:y:2015:i:3:p:204-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.