IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v21y2021i8p1005-1019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Countries’ commitments to soil organic carbon in Nationally Determined Contributions

Author

Listed:
  • Liesl Wiese
  • Eva Wollenberg
  • Viridiana Alcántara-Shivapatham
  • Meryl Richards
  • Sadie Shelton
  • Susanna Esther Hönle
  • Claudia Heidecke
  • Beáta Emoke Madari
  • Claire Chenu

Abstract

Soil carbon is the major active pool of terrestrial carbon, and as such, soil organic carbon (SOC) targets, policies and measures will be pivotal to achieving global climate targets. SOC sequestration may reduce the net annual greenhouse gas emissions from Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use by between 3% and 71%, while simultaneously supporting various ecosystem services. Accurate SOC accounting and monitoring, however, is constrained by various technical challenges related to indicators, rates of SOC change, measuring the impact of management practices on SOC, and the long-term persistence of sequestered SOC. We assessed countries’ pledges to the Paris Agreement for SOC in agriculture to better understand the level, transparency, and specificity of commitments. Reviewing 184 countries’ initial Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), we considered whether SOC was included, what was pledged, the level of ambition promised and the specificity of mitigation targets. Twenty-eight countries referred to SOC in their NDCs, citing quantified or unquantified mitigation targets, national policies or programs, and actions and measures to be implemented in agricultural lands (14), peatlands (6) or wetlands (14). Countries’ reasons for not including SOC in NDCs included the need to prioritize goals of sustainable development and food security above climate mitigation, a lack of incentives for farmers to improve management practices, and the difficulty of accurately monitoring changes in SOC. Including SOC targets in NDCs can improve NDCs’ comprehensiveness and transparency to track and compare policy progress across NDCs; it can also leverage SOC-related climate finance, technical support, and capacity building.Key policy insights Many NDCs specify practices known to have the potential to achieve SOC sequestration or protection without explicitly mentioning SOC. The SOC-related mitigation potential of these practices can be quantified in future NDCs.NDCs are not presently a good indicator of countries’ interest or commitment to SOC action at national level. To improve this, countries with existing SOC policies, programs, and actions can specify their SOC-related commitments in future NDCs.Increased collaboration between countries with experience managing SOC and countries needing support to develop SOC-related targets, policies, measures and incentives for land users and farmers would facilitate the provision of such needed support.To increase country commitments and attention to managing SOC, there is a need for improved SOC measurement and monitoring, for better evidence on the impacts of management practices on SOC, and for incentives for farmers to change practices and overcome barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Liesl Wiese & Eva Wollenberg & Viridiana Alcántara-Shivapatham & Meryl Richards & Sadie Shelton & Susanna Esther Hönle & Claudia Heidecke & Beáta Emoke Madari & Claire Chenu, 2021. "Countries’ commitments to soil organic carbon in Nationally Determined Contributions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 1005-1019, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:8:p:1005-1019
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1969883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2021.1969883
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2021.1969883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guang Han & Meredith T. Niles, 2023. "Interested but Uncertain: Carbon Markets and Data Sharing among U.S. Crop Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Camila Bonilla-Cedrez & Peter Steward & Todd S. Rosenstock & Philip Thornton & Jacobo Arango & Martin Kropff & Julian Ramirez-Villegas, 2023. "Priority areas for investment in more sustainable and climate-resilient livestock systems," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1279-1286, October.
    3. Cezary A. Kwiatkowski & Małgorzata Pawłowska & Elżbieta Harasim & Lucjan Pawłowski, 2023. "Strategies of Climate Change Mitigation in Agriculture Plant Production—A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:8:p:1005-1019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.