IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v19y2019i10p1325-1339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical characteristics of a solar geoengineering deployment and implications for governance

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas G. MacMartin
  • Peter J. Irvine
  • Ben Kravitz
  • Joshua B. Horton

Abstract

Consideration of solar geoengineering as a potential response to climate change will demand complex decisions. These include not only the choice of whether to deploy solar engineering, but decisions regarding how to deploy, and ongoing decision-making throughout deployment. Research on the governance of solar geoengineering to date has primarily engaged only with the question of whether to deploy. We examine the science of solar geoengineering in order to clarify the technical dimensions of decisions about deployment – both strategic and operational – and how these might influence governance considerations, while consciously refraining from making specific recommendations. The focus here is on a hypothetical deployment rather than governance of the research itself. We first consider the complexity surrounding the design of a deployment scheme, in particular the complicated and difficult decision of what its objective(s) would be, given that different choices for how to deploy will lead to different climate outcomes. Next, we discuss the on-going decisions across multiple timescales, from the sub-annual to the multi-decadal. For example, feedback approaches might effectively manage some uncertainties, but would require frequent adjustments to the solar geoengineering deployment in response to observations. Other decisions would be tied to the inherently slow process of detection and attribution of climate effects in the presence of natural variability. Both of these present challenges to decision-making. These considerations point toward particular governance requirements, including an important role for technical experts – with all the challenges that entails.Key policy insights Decisions about solar geoengineering deployment will be informed not only by political choices, but also by climate science and engineering.Design decisions will pertain to the spatial and temporal goals of a climate intervention and strategies for achieving those goals.Some uncertainty can be managed through feedback, but this would require frequent operational decisions.Some strategic decisions will depend on the detection and attribution of climatic effects from solar geoengineering, which may take decades.Governance for solar geoengineering deployment will likely need to incorporate technical expertise for making short-term adjustments to the deployment and conducting attribution analysis, while also slowing down decisions made in response to attribution analysis to avoid hasty choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas G. MacMartin & Peter J. Irvine & Ben Kravitz & Joshua B. Horton, 2019. "Technical characteristics of a solar geoengineering deployment and implications for governance," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1325-1339, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:19:y:2019:i:10:p:1325-1339
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1668347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2019.1668347
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2019.1668347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sikina Jinnah & David Morrow & Simon Nicholson, 2021. "Splitting Climate Engineering Governance: How Problem Structure Shapes Institutional Design," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S1), pages 8-19, April.
    2. Muhammet A. Bas & Aseem Mahajan, 2020. "Contesting the climate," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1985-2002, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:19:y:2019:i:10:p:1325-1339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.