IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v46y2026i3-4p308-331.html

Balancing trust and distrust in generative AI chatbot adoption: a case study from China

Author

Listed:
  • Khuram Shahzad
  • Ali Nawaz Khan
  • Bilal Ahmad
  • Khizar Hayat
  • Shan Chang

Abstract

Generative AI (GAI) chatbots are increasingly pivotal in transforming customer interactions across various industries, particularly in enhancing consumers’ experience and operational efficiency in e-commerce. Drawing on dual factor theory, the study examines how consumer trust and distrust beliefs in GAI chatbots influence consumer satisfaction and continued use. The study’s research framework is examined through collecting online data from Chinese consumers. The results indicate that perceived anthropomorphism, transparency, and efficiency positively influence consumers’ trust beliefs. Meanwhile, privacy concerns and emotional detachment positively influence consumers’ distrust beliefs. Consumer satisfaction and continued intention are positively influenced by trust and negatively influenced by distrust. Further, consumer satisfaction positively impacts continued intention. Finally, consumers’ IT knowledge positively moderates the relationship between consumers’ satisfaction and continued intention to use GAI chatbots. Several theoretical and practical implications reveal the need to make GAI chatbots more humanlike and responsive, as well as address consumers’ concerns to establish trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Khuram Shahzad & Ali Nawaz Khan & Bilal Ahmad & Khizar Hayat & Shan Chang, 2026. "Balancing trust and distrust in generative AI chatbot adoption: a case study from China," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3-4), pages 308-331, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:46:y:2026:i:3-4:p:308-331
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2025.2487819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2025.2487819
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2025.2487819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:46:y:2026:i:3-4:p:308-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.