IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v46y2026i1-2p1-26.html

The impact of AI service robots’ cognitive anthropomorphism on consumers’ subjective well-being – a moderated mediation model

Author

Listed:
  • Gang Li
  • Yuxi Wang
  • Hanyu Zhu
  • Mengjiao Zhu

Abstract

Advancements in artificial intelligence have led to the widespread use of AI service robots across the service industry, significantly enhancing consumers’ subjective well-being. This study integrates means-end chain (MEC) theory and social exchange theory (SET) to develop a framework for understanding the cognitive anthropomorphism of AI service robots and its impact on consumers’ well-being. Data were collected from 264 Chinese participants through a questionnaire survey and analyzed using PLS-SEM. The results show that the cognitive anthropomorphism of AI service robots positively influences consumers’ subjective well-being, with perceived intimacy and perceived threat acting as mediators. Additionally, trust is found to positively moderate the mediating effects of both perceived intimacy and perceived threat. This research contributes to our understanding of consumers’ psychological responses to using service robots, enriches the literature on subjective well-being, highlights the crucial role of trust in human-robot interactions, and provides practical recommendations for improving the design of AI service robots.

Suggested Citation

  • Gang Li & Yuxi Wang & Hanyu Zhu & Mengjiao Zhu, 2026. "The impact of AI service robots’ cognitive anthropomorphism on consumers’ subjective well-being – a moderated mediation model," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1-2), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:46:y:2026:i:1-2:p:1-26
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2025.2592608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2025.2592608
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2025.2592608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:46:y:2026:i:1-2:p:1-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.