IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v45y2025i15-16p1421-1445.html

Job crafting towards strengths and interests: how overqualification enhances creativity?

Author

Listed:
  • Yana Du
  • Jinlian Luo
  • Yaqi Su

Abstract

Personal motives are important to job crafting. Drawing on the job demands-resources theory, a two-pathway model of how overqualified employees manage the misfit between their capabilities and job requirements is proposed. Specifically, two novel job crafting strategies that can spur employees’ creativity are identified: job crafting towards strengths (JC-strengths) and job crafting towards interests (JC-interests). The different boundary effects of empowering leadership on the relationship between perceived overqualification and JC-strengths and JC-interests are investigated. Using data from 507 employees of Chinese firms, perceived overqualification was found to be positively related to JC-strengths and JC-interests; both JC-strengths and JC-interests were positively related to creativity; and empowering leadership moderated the direct effect of perceived overqualification on JC-strengths and its indirect effect on creativity, while the moderating effect was nonsignificant for the relationship linking perceived overqualification to JC-interests. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yana Du & Jinlian Luo & Yaqi Su, 2025. "Job crafting towards strengths and interests: how overqualification enhances creativity?," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(15-16), pages 1421-1445, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:45:y:2025:i:15-16:p:1421-1445
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2025.2457548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2025.2457548
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2025.2457548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:45:y:2025:i:15-16:p:1421-1445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.