IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v42y2022i5-6p360-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential and constraint of work gamification for employees’ creative performance

Author

Listed:
  • Juliet E. Ikhide
  • Ahmet Tarik Timur
  • Oluwatobi A. Ogunmokun

Abstract

Drawing on the affordance theory, this paper theorizes about how workplace creativity could be influenced by employees’ interaction with game design elements incorporated into work systems. To comprehensively capture possible relationships, two vital theoretical frameworks -ability-motivation-opportunity (AMO) and affordance theory, were employed to provide theoretical guidance and a basis upon which propositions were established. A review of literature in the field reveals that gamified work system, through the improvement of ability-, motivation- and opportunity-enhancing practices supports dimensions including employee’s motivation and competence which are prerequisites for a creative outcome. Furthermore, contrary to the common opinion, work gamification could constrain employees’ creativity at work. Theoretically grounded in existing theories and past literature, this conceptual paper touches on unpopular discussions in the literature, opens a research avenue for further studies by providing testable propositions and recommendations for practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliet E. Ikhide & Ahmet Tarik Timur & Oluwatobi A. Ogunmokun, 2022. "The potential and constraint of work gamification for employees’ creative performance," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5-6), pages 360-382, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:42:y:2022:i:5-6:p:360-382
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2022.2045278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2022.2045278
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2022.2045278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:42:y:2022:i:5-6:p:360-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.