IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v41y2021i11-12p832-851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating customers’ system justifying responses: application of system justification theory

Author

Listed:
  • Tiffany S. Legendre
  • Seonjeong (Ally) Lee

Abstract

Brand failures are detrimental for the business success. However, the extant literature has not yet investigated in what situation a brand failure can be perceived more negatively than has been previously thought. Grounded in system justification theory, this study investigates the influence of system threat on customers’ system justifying behaviors (willingness to forgive and purchase intention). Using different service contexts, this study executes three 2 × 2 between-subjects experiments to investigate the moderating roles of brand failure domain (Study 1 and Study 2 (replication)) and brand loyalty (Study 3). The results show that when a system threat occurs due to brand failure, customers perceive the failure worse than predicted, triggering system justifying behavior, especially when a brand failure occurs in brand essence, and when customers are not part of a loyal customer group. Our results suggest brand management strategies that can better manage system threatening brand failures and customers’ system justifying behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiffany S. Legendre & Seonjeong (Ally) Lee, 2021. "Investigating customers’ system justifying responses: application of system justification theory," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(11-12), pages 832-851, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:41:y:2021:i:11-12:p:832-851
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2019.1579800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2019.1579800
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2019.1579800?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:41:y:2021:i:11-12:p:832-851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.