IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v20y2017i1p114-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative self-study: Lessons from a study of wearable fitness technology and physical activity

Author

Listed:
  • Bradley J. Baker
  • Xiaochen Zhou
  • Anthony D. Pizzo
  • James Du
  • Daniel C. Funk

Abstract

•Review of collaborative self-study (autoethnography and self-ethnography).•Collaborative self-study is an under-utilised method in sport management research.•Provides a general methodological review with specific examples drawn from our study.•We review ethics, benefits, challenges, opportunities, and implications of the method.•We encourage sport management researchers to consider using collaborative self-study.While researchers in related disciplines have embraced and benefited from use of unconventional contemporary qualitative research methods extending beyond interviews and case studies, sport management researchers largely have not thus far. The purpose of this article is to encourage greater use of collaborative self-study (autoethnography and self-ethnography) within sport management research. Based on our experience with a collaborative self-study research project examining the influence of wearable fitness technology on physical activity, we explore key methodological considerations focusing on the ethics of self-study, and the benefits, challenges, and opportunities associated with employing this underutilized qualitative method in sport management research. Collaborative self-study offers the opportunity to address questions and examine sport phenomena from perspectives rarely addressed by traditional approaches. Through reviewing collaborative self-study, we provide guidance for sport management researchers and encourage researchers to consider this method in their future projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Bradley J. Baker & Xiaochen Zhou & Anthony D. Pizzo & James Du & Daniel C. Funk, 2017. "Collaborative self-study: Lessons from a study of wearable fitness technology and physical activity," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 114-127, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:20:y:2017:i:1:p:114-127
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2016.10.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.smr.2016.10.008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2016.10.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cox, Michele & Dickson, Geoff & Cox, Barbara, 2017. "Lifting the veil on allowing headscarves in football: A co-constructed and analytical autoethnography," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 522-534.
    2. Hoeber, Larena & Shaw, Sally, 2017. "Contemporary qualitative research methods in sport management," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 4-7.
    3. Vera Pedragosa & Salvador Angosto & Celina Gonçalves, 2022. "Validity and Reliability of a Wearable Fitness Technology Scale in Portugal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Zhou, Xiaochen & Hanlon, Clare & Robertson, Jonathan & Spaaij, Ramon & Westerbeek, Hans & Hossack, Allison & Funk, Daniel C., 2018. "Dress for fit: An exploration of female activewear consumption," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 403-415.
    5. Inje Cho & Kyriaki Kaplanidou & Shintaro Sato, 2021. "Gamified Wearable Fitness Tracker for Physical Activity: A Comprehensive Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:20:y:2017:i:1:p:114-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.