IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v19y2016i3p319-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affective response to gambling promotions during televised sport: A qualitative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Lamont
  • Nerilee Hing
  • Peter Vitartas

Abstract

•Affective responses to gambling promotions during televised sport were analysed.•Qualitative data were collected via a series of online focus groups with Australian sport viewers.•Positive, negative and neutral affects were reported across a variety of gambling promotion types.•Affective responses varied according to message delivery format and context in which promotions were displayed.•A conceptual model was generated to facilitate future research around affective responses to gambling promotions during televised sport.Gambling promotions extensively punctuate contemporary televised sport broadcasts and concerns have been raised about their potential impacts on vulnerable groups. Research suggests advertising can shape individuals’ emotions, or affect, towards a product/brand and can subsequently influence purchasing decisions. Consequently, understanding how promotion of gambling influences sport viewers is an important although sparsely addressed area of research. This paper presents exploratory research on affective responses towards gambling promotions displayed during televised sport. Eight online focus groups were conducted with a sample of regular sports viewers in Queensland, Australia. Participants were exposed to a variety of gambling promotions used in National Rugby League match telecasts. Utilising adaptive theory, themes reflecting affective responses to each promotional technique were identified. A range of positive and negative affective responses were identified including arousal, joy, anger and worry. A conceptual model representing emergent affective response categories, message delivery techniques and moderating variables is proposed to inform a broader future research agenda examining how gambling promotions during televised sport influence affective response and concomitant gambling intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Lamont & Nerilee Hing & Peter Vitartas, 2016. "Affective response to gambling promotions during televised sport: A qualitative analysis," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 319-331, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:19:y:2016:i:3:p:319-331
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2015.06.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.smr.2015.06.002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2015.06.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Zimu & Gonzalez-Serrano, Maria H. & Porreca, Rocco & Jones, Paul, 2021. "Innovative sports-embedded gambling promotion: A study of spectators’ enjoyment and gambling intention during XFL games," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 206-216.
    2. Stadler Blank, Ashley & Loveland, Katherine E. & Houghton, David M., 2021. "Game changing innovation or bad beat? How sports betting can reduce fan engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 365-374.
    3. Mark Legg & Murat Hancer, 2020. "How patrons value casino promotional offers: A conjoint study," Tourism Economics, , vol. 26(4), pages 640-657, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:19:y:2016:i:3:p:319-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.