IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v26y2024i10p2992-3012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constraining co-creation? An ethnographic study of Healthwatch organizations in England

Author

Listed:
  • Graham P. Martin
  • Amit Desai
  • Giulia Zoccatelli
  • Sally Brearley
  • Glenn Robert

Abstract

While the potential benefits of co-production and co-creation are widely vaunted, the degree to which they precipitate innovative change in systems varies, and influences on their impact demand greater attention. We present an ethnographic study of organizations intended to foster co-creation in English health and social care. Comparing five cases, we find demonstrable activity and some tangible impacts. At the same time, the positioning of these organizations as collaborative insiders in local governance systems constrained the publics and issues that were prioritized in co-creative activities. Our findings highlight the significance of discursive forms of meta-governance in delimiting the scope of co-creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham P. Martin & Amit Desai & Giulia Zoccatelli & Sally Brearley & Glenn Robert, 2024. "Constraining co-creation? An ethnographic study of Healthwatch organizations in England," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(10), pages 2992-3012, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:26:y:2024:i:10:p:2992-3012
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2024.2308186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2024.2308186
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2024.2308186?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:26:y:2024:i:10:p:2992-3012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.