IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v24y2022i6p819-839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who can serve as the proxy for public employees in public administration experiments? a cross-sample comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoli Lu
  • Weijie Wang
  • Hao Xu

Abstract

This article examines whether convenience samples such as undergraduate students, MPA students, and online subjects can replicate the findings based on public officials in experimental research. We used a 2 × 2 factorial experimental design (High/Low Help-deservingness Clients × With/Without Situational Stress) with scenarios of discretionary decision-making by street-level bureaucrats in China. The four samples showed a consistent pattern in the impact of client help-deservingness on discretionary decision-making, but differed in the effects of situational stress on discretionary decision-making. We suggest that researchers be cautious in using convenience samples as surrogates for professional bureaucrats when the scenarios require professional expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoli Lu & Weijie Wang & Hao Xu, 2022. "Who can serve as the proxy for public employees in public administration experiments? a cross-sample comparison," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 819-839, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:24:y:2022:i:6:p:819-839
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1864014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2020.1864014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2020.1864014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:24:y:2022:i:6:p:819-839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.