IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rptpxx/v16y2015i4p517-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional practices and planning for walking: A focus on built environment audits

Author

Listed:
  • Courtney Babb
  • Carey Curtis

Abstract

Built environment audits, part of the “toolbox” for planning multi-modal urban transport systems, are used to evaluate the walkability of streets. Whereas the methodological features of audits have attracted attention from planning research, little attention has been paid to the institutional contexts where audits are developed and used. Drawing on literature on audit culture in contemporary institutions and on expert interviews with audit developers and professionals in Australia and New Zealand working with walking audits, three questions are addressed: Who uses walkability audits? How are they used? What substantive changes emerge from auditing practice? The knowledge of practice of auditing the built environment for walking is underdeveloped. While planners, engineers and advocates consider built environment audits useful in different ways, of concern is the use of audits to rationalise limited resources already devoted to infrastructure for walking, rather than produce substantive changes to the quality of the built environment for walking.

Suggested Citation

  • Courtney Babb & Carey Curtis, 2015. "Institutional practices and planning for walking: A focus on built environment audits," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 517-534, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:16:y:2015:i:4:p:517-534
    DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1084361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14649357.2015.1084361
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14649357.2015.1084361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shatu, Farjana & Yigitcanlar, Tan, 2018. "Development and validity of a virtual street walkability audit tool for pedestrian route choice analysis—SWATCH," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 148-160.
    2. Crystal Legacy, 2017. "Transport planning in the urban age," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 177-180, April.
    3. Lovelace, Robin & Parkin, John & Cohen, Tom, 2020. "Open access transport models: A leverage point in sustainable transport planning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 47-54.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:16:y:2015:i:4:p:517-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rptp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.