IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rmdjxx/v11y2019i2p165-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How gender biased are female-headed household transfers in Egypt?

Author

Listed:
  • Lobna M. AbdelLatif
  • Mohamed Ramadan
  • Sarah A. Elbakry

Abstract

In this paper, we claim that the policy of targeting female-headed households’ (FHHs) may generate bias against women in male-headed households (MHHs) who may be more poverty-constrained. Targeting FHHs may have the merit of clear targeting; however, it doesn’t address the feminization phenomenon of poverty; instead, it presents unequal opportunities for women in other families by less favouring them. We argue that proper targeting could be derived based on the number of women in families. The study applied a Gender-Based Poverty Detection Model to provide a good detection of household poverty and show that the vulnerable characteristics of females could be more influenced by the general household’s poverty than females’ headed households. Model results showed that not all FHHs are poor, and that some de jure MHHs include a large number of poor females. This means that targeting only de jure FHHs might result in resource leakage to the non-poor and under-coverage of poor de facto FHHs and poor females in MHHs. The analysis asserts that female headship is not always a correlate of poverty in Egypt. An important correlate, however, is the share of female members in the household. This raises questions about the effectiveness of social assistance and poverty alleviation programmes in Egypt in targeting female poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Lobna M. AbdelLatif & Mohamed Ramadan & Sarah A. Elbakry, 2019. "How gender biased are female-headed household transfers in Egypt?," Middle East Development Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 165-183, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rmdjxx:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:165-183
    DOI: 10.1080/17938120.2019.1668162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17938120.2019.1668162
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17938120.2019.1668162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rmdjxx:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:165-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rmdj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.