IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjpaxx/v84y2018i2p145-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State of the Art in Planning for College and University Campuses: Site Planning and Beyond

Author

Listed:
  • Linda C. Dalton
  • Amir H. Hajrasouliha
  • William W. Riggs

Abstract

Problem, research strategy, and findings: Colleges and universities have been planning their campuses for centuries, yet scholars have conducted little empirical research regarding the nature of campus planning in the United States. We review recent scholarship on campus planning, discovering that it is dominated by case studies (sometimes in edited collections) and some comparative studies. In this review we organize the literature into 3 geographic scales: the campus per se (or campus park), the campus–­community interface, and the larger campus district. The literature addresses 5 topics: land use, design, sustainability, economic development, and collaboration. Most of the studies focus on research-oriented universities in metropolitan locations. The literature emphasizes how campus master planning can support student learning, how design and building guidelines can make a campus more cohesive, and how campuses are adopting sustainable development and operations. At the campus–­community interface, the research documents how some colleges and universities have expanded beyond their traditional boundaries, invested in local economic development, and worked with their communities to improve transportation and reduce environmental impacts. Studies of campus district planning emphasize community adoption of development regulations and code enforcement procedures to reduce the impact of students living in nearby neighborhoods. The literature stresses the importance of partnerships, collaboration, and enhanced communications between the university and the community.Takeaway for practice: University planners should continue to focus on site design that reinforces student learning and environmental sustainability and on community interface planning that supports economic development and reduces environmental impacts. City planners should expand campus district planning to address a broad array of issues and opportunities. Both university and city planners should facilitate collaboration between their institutions. Scholars should study a wide range of colleges and universities, including 2-year as well as 4-year institutions and those in nonurban settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda C. Dalton & Amir H. Hajrasouliha & William W. Riggs, 2018. "State of the Art in Planning for College and University Campuses: Site Planning and Beyond," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(2), pages 145-161, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:84:y:2018:i:2:p:145-161
    DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2018.1435300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01944363.2018.1435300
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01944363.2018.1435300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Guo & Da-Fang Wu & Yue Li & Feng-Xi Wang & Yong-Qi Ye & Hua-Wei Lin & Chi-Fang Zhang, 2022. "Suitability Evaluation of Popular Science Tourism Sites in University Towns: Case Study of Guangzhou University Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Donghyun Kim & Sanghoon Lee & Seiyong Kim, 2023. "Study of Campustown Projects for the Sustainable Win-Win Growth of Universities and Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Paul M. Garton, 2023. "Universities and Gentrification: The Effects of Anchor Institution Initiatives on Rates of Neighborhood Change," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 64(7), pages 987-1010, November.
    4. Mona Ali & Youngmin Kim, 2020. "Can a University Campus Work as a Public Space in the Metropolis of a Developing Country? The Case of Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:84:y:2018:i:2:p:145-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.