IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjeaxx/v14y2020i4p613-632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpreting contemporary Oromo politics in Ethiopia: an ethnographic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Terje Østebø
  • Kjetil Tronvoll

Abstract

Decades of both non-violent and armed struggle did not bring much result to the Oromo quest for political power over the Ethiopian state, and contemporary Oromo politics often appear recondite and discordant. When Abiy Ahmed came to power as the new Prime Minister in April 2018 as the first Oromo politician entering the former imperial palace, many believed it was the Oromo’s turn to rule. Developments since then have, however, revealed a far more complex picture, where previous internal divisions have resurfaced, and where the inherently fragmented nature of Oromo politics seems to have prevailed. Drawing on recent interviews, in this article, we argue that the current divisions and positions in Oromo politics may be made explicable by applying a multilayered ethnographic approach to identify their provenance and grassroots anchoring. With the three main positions found within Oromo politics – the unitarist, secessionist, and federalist – as our point of departure, we unveil the deeper connections between the current political positioning and their historical trajectories and ethnographic anchoring, and we capture overlooked and competing power discourses informing Oromo politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Terje Østebø & Kjetil Tronvoll, 2020. "Interpreting contemporary Oromo politics in Ethiopia: an ethnographic approach," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 613-632, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:14:y:2020:i:4:p:613-632
    DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2020.1796255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17531055.2020.1796255
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17531055.2020.1796255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asebe Debelo Regassa & Rony Emmenegger, 2023. "The emperor, the lion and the peacock: Monuments and contested state sovereignty in contemporary Ethiopia," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(5), pages 903-921, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:14:y:2020:i:4:p:613-632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.