IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v10y2019i1p18-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do the different store formats of the same brand matter to Chinese customers? An International study on a Japanese fashion brand

Author

Listed:
  • Miao Miao

Abstract

Many retailers have recently been building a greater variety of store formats and attempting to provide a superior shopping experience through their store environment in order to increase the possibility of customer revisitation and customer loyalty. However, less research pays attention to the issue of how, and to what extent, the different store formats have on impacting customer satisfaction and loyalty building. In order to improve the understanding of the satisfaction–loyalty link in the context of retail internationalization, we survey a Japanese fashion company – Nice Claup – that segmented the Chinese market by operating multiple retail stores and each retail store plays a discrete role of cultivating customer loyalty. Through 388-customer survey data, the results suggest that while attitudinal loyalty positively and directly influences behavioral loyalty, satisfaction indirectly drives behavioral loyalty through the mediating effects of attitudinal loyalty. The implication is that an application of implementing retail internationalization with adopting multiple store formats on different types of customers and customer behavioral loyalty can be transferred by offering multi-brands store more effectively than the single-brand store in the Chinese fashion market.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao Miao, 2019. "Do the different store formats of the same brand matter to Chinese customers? An International study on a Japanese fashion brand," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 18-34, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:18-34
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2018.1550005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2018.1550005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2018.1550005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:18-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.