IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capitalists, Workers and Thomas Piketty's


  • Thomas R. Michl


This paper interprets Piketty's influential work through the lens of structuralist macroeconomic theory, which is a synthesis of the classical, Marxian and Keynesian traditions. It shows that Piketty's key inequality, $r \gt g$r>g (the rate of profit is greater than the rate of growth) measures the influence of capitalist consumption on capital accumulation in the context of a growth model with capitalists and workers in the tradition of Nicholas Kaldor and Luigi Pasinetti. The paper shows how in the structuralist model the connections Piketty makes between growth and inequality become more transparent and less confusing than they are in the neoclassical theory he resorts to using. The paper also examines his data with emphasis on two central paradoxes of neoliberalism: with all the upward redistribution of income, there is surprisingly little concentration of the wealth distribution; and with a higher profit rate, there has been no corresponding increase in growth. The hypothesis suggested by structuralist growth theory is that neoliberal capitalism has transformed Marx's ‘accumulate, accumulate' into ‘consume, consume.' The political-economic implications of this hypothesis are significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas R. Michl, 2016. "Capitalists, Workers and Thomas Piketty's," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 205-219, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:28:y:2016:i:2:p:205-219
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2015.1060059

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Lance Taylor, 2014. "The Triumph of the Rentier? Thomas Piketty vs. Luigi Pasinetti & John Maynard Keynes," SCEPA working paper series. SCEPA's main areas of research are macroeconomic policy, inequality and poverty, and globalization. 2014-7, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    2. repec:mes:ijpoec:v:43:y:2014:i:3:p:4-17 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:28:y:2016:i:2:p:205-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.