IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v15y2003i2p173-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of Cost-based Pricing Rules in Britain: An institutionalist perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mirghani Ahmed
  • Robert Scapens

Abstract

This paper illustrates how an institutionalist perspective can help us understand the development of cost-based pricing rules in Britain. It explores the historical development of rule-based procedures, such as absorption costing and the cost allocation systems used by trade associations and government departments in the first half of the last century. The intention is to identify the institutional rationalities that underpinned the evolution of these supposedly 'irrational' practices. A case study of British Printers in the early years of the 20th century illustrates how a rule-based system, collectively designed and built around costing knowledge was used to promote stability and certainty in a chaotic market. Similarly, the cost-based rules introduced and administered by the British Government during the First and Second World Wars were used to control overpricing and profiteering, and hence cost measurement was seen as instrumental in bringing stability and control to a market that was operating in an apparently unacceptable way. In the post-war period, however, similar cost-based pricing rules and cost allocations procedures were implicated in a variety of restrictive practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirghani Ahmed & Robert Scapens, 2003. "The Evolution of Cost-based Pricing Rules in Britain: An institutionalist perspective," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 173-191.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:15:y:2003:i:2:p:173-191
    DOI: 10.1080/0953825032000064878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0953825032000064878
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0953825032000064878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lounsbury, Michael, 2008. "Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(4-5), pages 349-361.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:15:y:2003:i:2:p:173-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.