IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repsxx/v11y2023i3p365-381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of trust and power are associated with tax compliance: A cross-cultural study

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Kogler
  • Jerome Olsen
  • Erich Kirchler
  • Larissa M. Batrancea
  • Anca Nichita

Abstract

The slippery slope framework (SSF) of tax compliance postulates that taxpayers’ compliance behaviour depends on the two dimensions: trust in authorities and power of authorities. In an attempt to overcome common-method biases, the present study tests the main assumptions of the SSF with a sample of 44 countries/regions. Country/region-level trust and power indices are calculated based on experimental data involving 14,509 participants and related to shadow economy estimates and – as an alternative indicator of non-compliance – corruption indices. The results indicate that both trust and power are negatively related to the size of the shadow economy and the extent of corruption. These results emphasise the importance of both SSF dimensions in combating tax evasion and counterproductive behaviour within a society in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Kogler & Jerome Olsen & Erich Kirchler & Larissa M. Batrancea & Anca Nichita, 2023. "Perceptions of trust and power are associated with tax compliance: A cross-cultural study," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 365-381, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:365-381
    DOI: 10.1080/20954816.2022.2130501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20954816.2022.2130501
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20954816.2022.2130501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:365-381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/reps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.