IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rehdxx/v30y2015i2p95-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential for Diversification? The Role of the Formal Sector in Bechuanaland Protectorate's Economy, 1900-65

Author

Listed:
  • Jutta Bolt
  • Ellen Hillbom

Abstract

While Botswana since independence has experienced impressive economic growth and development this progress has not been accompanied by economic diversification and endogenous growth. In this article we focus on the colonial period and investigate to what extent the formal sector of Bechuanaland Protectorate (colonial Botswana) had the potential to constitute the basis for a diversification of the dominating cattle economy away from its dependency on exporting a single natural resource good - beef. We base our study on colonial archive sources and anthropological evidence which we use to: examine labour market structures; estimate welfare ratios and surplus; and discuss government spending. We find that the demand for skilled labour and human capital development was low throughout the colonial period and that the private sector generally lacked the economic strength and dynamics to develop alternative and/or complementary sectors. Further, we find no evidence of demand driven diversification, neither stemming from private sector consumption and investments, nor from government spending on economic activities outside the cattle sector, infrastructure and human capital development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jutta Bolt & Ellen Hillbom, 2015. "Potential for Diversification? The Role of the Formal Sector in Bechuanaland Protectorate's Economy, 1900-65," Economic History of Developing Regions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 95-124, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rehdxx:v:30:y:2015:i:2:p:95-124
    DOI: 10.1080/20780389.2015.1066671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20780389.2015.1066671
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20780389.2015.1066671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rehdxx:v:30:y:2015:i:2:p:95-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rehd20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.