IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v59y2025i1p2429626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart Specialisation or smart following? A study of policy mimicry in priority domain selection

Author

Listed:
  • Korneliusz Pylak
  • Jason Deegan
  • Tom Broekel

Abstract

This paper explores the phenomenon of mimicry in the selection of economic domains for Smart Specialisation Strategies (S3) and discusses the regional policy implications of strategic mimicry. By analysing S3 documents from European regions, we identify and distinguish between two general types of mimicry: ‘follow the peers’ and ‘follow the role models’, against the more desirable ‘follow the indicators’ priority selection strategy. Our findings reveal that although regions rely on their strengths by following the crucial indicators, thus exhibiting non-mimetic behaviour, there is a stronger tendency for regions to mimic popular domain portfolios, particularly those chosen by neighbouring regions and national strategies. Understanding these patterns in the selection of priority domains helps decision-makers balance mimicry and diversification, promoting specialisation, new economic activities, and regional uniqueness.

Suggested Citation

  • Korneliusz Pylak & Jason Deegan & Tom Broekel, 2025. "Smart Specialisation or smart following? A study of policy mimicry in priority domain selection," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2429626-242, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:59:y:2025:i:1:p:2429626
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2024.2429626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00343404.2024.2429626
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343404.2024.2429626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:59:y:2025:i:1:p:2429626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.