IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v33y1999i5p477-482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuity and change: A review of english regeneration policy in the 1990s

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Hall
  • Brendan Nevin

Abstract

In this issue of the Policy Review Section , Stephen Hall and Brendan Nevin of the Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Birmingham, review the experiences of the first three rounds of the Single Regeneration Budget and against that background consider the next steps in the development of regeneration policy. In the second article, Peter Lee also of the Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, examines the policy implications of the recent changes in the methods for identifying deprived areas following the introduction of the Index for Local Deprivation. In the third article, Peter Newman of the School of Built Environment, University of Westminster, and Gilles Verpraet of the Centre d'Analyses et d'Interventions Sociologiques, Paris, set out the findings of a comparative European research network which examined the nature and experience of public-private partnerships in urban governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Hall & Brendan Nevin, 1999. "Continuity and change: A review of english regeneration policy in the 1990s," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 477-482.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:33:y:1999:i:5:p:477-482
    DOI: 10.1080/00343409950081310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343409950081310
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343409950081310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Edwards, 1997. "Urban Policy: The Victory of Form over Substance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(5-6), pages 825-843, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Willem K. Korthals Altes, 2002. "Local Government and the Decentralisation of Urban Regeneration Policies in The Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1439-1452, July.
    2. Ali Modarres, 2002. "Persistent Poverty and the Failure of Area-Based Initiatives in the U.S," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 17(4), pages 289-302, November.
    3. Changsong Oh & Jisoo Sim, 2022. "Effectiveness of Public Partnerships in Non-Urban Regeneration Projects in Korea: Seeing through Place-Keeping Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Valler & David Betteley, 2001. "The Politics of 'Integrated' Local Policy in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2393-2413, December.
    2. Rob Atkinson, 2000. "Combating Social Exclusion in Europe: The New Urban Policy Challenge," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(5-6), pages 1037-1055, May.
    3. Claire Edwards, 2001. "Inclusion in Regeneration: A Place for Disabled People?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 267-286, February.
    4. Steven Henderson, 2012. "An Evaluation of the Layering and Legacy of Area-based Regeneration Initiatives in England: The Case of Wolverhampton," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(6), pages 1201-1227, May.
    5. Raphael Calel & Alex Jeffery & Tim Laing & Sander van den Burg & Alexandru V Roman & Marta Bivand Erdal & Sander van der Linden & Raphael Calel & Jana Temelová & Justin Greaves & Emma Street, 2012. "Review: Progress for the Poor, Walled States, Waning Sovereignty, the International Handbook on Non-Market Environmental Valuation, Timber, Global Corruption Report: Climate Change, the Political Econ," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(4), pages 746-760, August.
    6. Chris Jensen-Butler, 1999. "Cities in Competition: Equity Issues," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 865-891, May.
    7. Brendan Murtagh, 1999. "Listening to Communities: Locality Research and Planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(7), pages 1181-1193, June.
    8. Ofek, Yuval, 2017. "Evaluating social exclusion interventions in university-community partnerships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 46-55.
    9. Andrew Wallace, 2010. "New Neighbourhoods, New Citizens? Challenging ‘Community’ as a Framework for Social and Moral Regeneration under New Labour in the UK," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 805-819, December.
    10. Geoff Fordham & Jo Hutchinson & Paul Foley, 1999. "Strategic Approaches to Local Regeneration: The Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 131-141.
    11. Norman Ginsburg, 1999. "Putting the social into urban regeneration policy," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 14(1), pages 55-71, May.
    12. John Mccarthy, 1999. "Urban regeneration in Scotland: An agenda for the Scottish Parliament," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 559-566.
    13. Peter Matthews, 2012. "From Area-Based Initiatives to Strategic Partnerships: Have We Lost the Meaning of Regeneration?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 147-161, February.
    14. Peter Shirlow & Brendan Murtagh, 2004. "Capacity-building, Representation and Intracommunity Conflict," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(1), pages 57-70, January.
    15. Ivan Turok & Nick Hopkins, 1998. "Competition and Area Selection in Scotland's New Urban Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(11), pages 2021-2061, November.
    16. McCarthy, John, 1999. "Encouraging sustainable urban regeneration in Scotland: learning from Europe," ERSA conference papers ersa99pa003, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Nick Oatley, 2000. "New Labour's Approach to Age-old Problems," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 15(2), pages 86-97, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:33:y:1999:i:5:p:477-482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.