IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcybxx/v5y2020i3p413-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hacking democracy: managing influence campaigns and disinformation in the digital age

Author

Listed:
  • Niels Nagelhus Schia
  • Lars Gjesvik

Abstract

How are states responding to the threat of using digital technologies to subvert democratic processes? Protecting political and democratic processes from interference via digital technologies is a new and complicated security threat. In recent years the issue has been most prominent in terms of election security, yet the widespread usage of digital technologies allows for the subversion of democratic processes in multifaceted ways. From disrupting the political discourse with false information to inflaming and stoking political divisions digital technologies allows for a variety of ways for malicious actors to target democracies. This article compares different state experiences with interference in sovereign and contested political decisions. More specifically the article compares the Norwegian approach and experience in managing these challenges with those of Finland and the UK. Mapping both how the problem is understood, and the role of previous experiences in shaping public policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels Nagelhus Schia & Lars Gjesvik, 2020. "Hacking democracy: managing influence campaigns and disinformation in the digital age," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 413-428, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:5:y:2020:i:3:p:413-428
    DOI: 10.1080/23738871.2020.1820060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23738871.2020.1820060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23738871.2020.1820060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marie Heřmanová, 2022. "Politicisation of the Domestic: Populist Narratives About Covid-19 Among Influencers," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 180-190.
    2. Paulo Carlos López-López & Daniel Barredo-Ibáñez & Erika Jaráiz-Gulías, 2023. "Research on Digital Political Communication: Electoral Campaigns, Disinformation, and Artificial Intelligence," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-5, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:5:y:2020:i:3:p:413-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcyb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.