IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v37y2017i3p205-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New development: Fundraising in UK charities—stepping back from the abyss

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Hind

Abstract

Fundraising techniques used by charities can enhance or diminish public trust. The dangers of questionable and over-aggressive fundraising practices are very real. In particular, in the UK, the ‘Olive Cooke affair’ in 2015 triggered a highlevel examination of fairly widespread dubious practices. In this article, the reflections of a key actor on the events surrounding the affair, and subsequent fallout, are examined. It is argued that this whole saga has the potential to encourage the development of a charity sector that is more trusted by the public; a sector that has stepped back from the abyss.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Hind, 2017. "New development: Fundraising in UK charities—stepping back from the abyss," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 205-210, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:37:y:2017:i:3:p:205-210
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2017.1282238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2017.1282238
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2017.1282238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyndman, Noel & McConville, Danielle, 2018. "Trust and accountability in UK charities: Exploring the virtuous circle," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 227-237.
    2. Hyndman, Noel & McKillop, Donal, 2018. "Public services and charities: Accounting, accountability and governance at a time of change," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 143-148.
    3. Yasmin, Sofia & Ghafran, Chaudhry & Haslam, Jim, 2021. "Centre-staging beneficiaries in charity accountability: Insights from an Islamic post-secular perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Chaudhry Ghafran & Sofia Yasmin, 2020. "Ethical Governance: Insight from the Islamic Perspective and an Empirical Enquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 513-533, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:37:y:2017:i:3:p:205-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.