IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v36y2016i2p145-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New development: Procurement and policy outcomes--a bridge too far?

Author

Listed:
  • Pat Barrett

Abstract

This article furthers the discussion in the March 2015 (Vol. 35, No. 2) issue of Public Money & Management on 'Public procurement policy and practice-- international lessons and debates'. In particular, it illustrates some of the major difficulties in achieving the required policy outcomes through the procurement processes. The numerous 'failures', particularly in the defence acquisitions area, are of ongoing concern both in terms of 'blow-outs' in costs and, more unfortunately, in achieving strategic defence capability and overall policy outcomes in required timeframes. Can current public sector reforms and observed better practice provide any encouragement for, discipline on, participants to achieve the required results or is it all just too difficult?

Suggested Citation

  • Pat Barrett, 2016. "New development: Procurement and policy outcomes--a bridge too far?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 145-148, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:36:y:2016:i:2:p:145-148
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1118939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2016.1118939
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2016.1118939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David McKevitt, 2015. "Debate: Value for money-in search of a definition," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 99-100, March.
    2. Susan Newberry, 2015. "Public sector accounting: shifting concepts of accountability," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 371-376, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurelio Tommasetti & Riccardo Mussari & Gennaro Maione & Daniela Sorrentino, 2020. "Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Sheila Ellwood & Susan Newberry, 2016. "New development: The conceptual underpinnings of international public sector accounting," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 231-234, April.
    3. Lucia Biondi & Enrico Bracci, 2018. "Sustainability, Popular and Integrated Reporting in the Public Sector: A Fad and Fashion Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Gabriele Palozzi & Sandro Brunelli & Camilla Falivena, 2018. "Higher Sustainability and Lower Opportunistic Behaviour in Healthcare: A New Framework for Performing Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Pessino, Carola & Izquierdo, Alejandro & Vuletin, Guillermo, 2018. "Better Spending for Better Lives: How Latin America and the Caribbean Can Do More with Less," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 9152, May.
    6. Laura Saraite-Sariene & Juana Alonso-Cañadas & Federico Galán-Valdivieso & Carmen Caba-Pérez, 2019. "Non-Financial Information versus Financial as a Key to the Stakeholder Engagement: A Higher Education Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Sheila Ellwood, 2016. "Editorial," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 157-161, April.
    8. Monica Bruzzone & Renata Paola Dameri & Paola Demartini, 2021. "Resilience Reporting for Sustainable Development in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Issam Benhayoun & M. Marghich Abdellatif, 2017. "IFRS for SMEs: A Structured Literature Review [International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting]," Post-Print hal-01910461, HAL.
    10. Zhao, Jianfeng & Greenwood, David & Thurairajah, Niraj & Liu, Henry J. & Haigh, Richard, 2022. "Value for money in transport infrastructure investment: An enhanced model for better procurement decisions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 68-78.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:36:y:2016:i:2:p:145-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.