IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v23y2003i4p237-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Pay Review Bodies in Britain Under the Labour Government

Author

Listed:
  • Geoff White
  • Alastair Hatchett

Abstract

The current Labour Government's public sector ‘modernization’ policy has placed new pressures on the 30-year-old Pay Review Body system. The Government is now expecting the six Review Bodies to make recommendations on pay reform and restructuring and key decisions on pay for public sector groups are being taken by Government outside of the Review Body process. Despite these problems, the Pay Review Body system still offers the main parties—the Government, employers and unions—a useful political device for handling pay determination at ‘arm's length’ in the public sector. While political expediency is the main defence for the Pay Review Bodies, the move to long-term agreements may undermine their role.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoff White & Alastair Hatchett, 2003. "The Pay Review Bodies in Britain Under the Labour Government," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 237-244, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:23:y:2003:i:4:p:237-244
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9302.00378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-9302.00378
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9302.00378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim Mather & Roger Seifert, 2016. "Police pay—contested and contestable," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 204-219, May.
    2. Stephen Bach, 2016. "Deprivileging the public sector workforce: Austerity, fragmentation and service withdrawal in Britain," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(1), pages 11-28, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:23:y:2003:i:4:p:237-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.