IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v4y2002i1p45-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closing the Gap Between Research and Practice in Health: Lessons from a clinical effectiveness initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Surender
  • Louise Locock
  • David Chambers
  • Sue Dopson
  • John Gabbay

Abstract

Pressure to utilize research evidence in decisions about patient care and population health, so-called evidence-based medicine, has swept the health care systems of most industrial countries. In the UK, the attention of policy makers has recently turned from the production of more 'effectiveness information' to the more fundamental challenge of understanding the factors involved in influencing the attitudes and practices of health care professionals. This article seeks to contribute to this process by reporting the findings of an evaluation of a clinical effectiveness initiative established in Wales between 1996-9 (Locock et al . 1999). The study shows that a number of different factors are involved in improving the implementation of effectiveness information, including the strength of the evidence, and the role of peer influence. However it is the interaction of various elements rather than any single factor, which appears to be crucial. These findings are important not only for health but for informing future interventions across other parts of the public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Surender & Louise Locock & David Chambers & Sue Dopson & John Gabbay, 2002. "Closing the Gap Between Research and Practice in Health: Lessons from a clinical effectiveness initiative," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 45-61, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:4:y:2002:i:1:p:45-61
    DOI: 10.1080/14616670110101690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14616670110101690
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14616670110101690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:4:y:2002:i:1:p:45-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.