IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v10y2022i1p2145749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of going-concern audit opinions: evidence from Vietnam stock exchange-listed companies

Author

Listed:
  • Duc Hieu Pham

Abstract

In this study, we aim to examine the effect of company and auditor characteristics on the issuance of going-concern opinions. The study population encompasses all financially distressed manufacturing companies listed on the Vietnam Stock Exchange during 2010–2019. The results indicate that the financial condition, incurring loss, audit report delay, and frequency of the board of director meetings significantly influence the issuance of auditors’ going-concern opinions. Company size, auditor size, and other financial ratios such as return on asset, leverage, and liquidity have no significant impact on the going-concern audit opinions. This study contributes to the limited research on going-concern audit opinions in the context of Vietnam. The results also provide a basis for recommendations to both auditors and audit clients on the determinants of going-concern audit opinions.

Suggested Citation

  • Duc Hieu Pham, 2022. "Determinants of going-concern audit opinions: evidence from Vietnam stock exchange-listed companies," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2145749-214, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:2145749
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2022.2145749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2022.2145749
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2022.2145749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:2145749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.