IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/nzecpp/v52y2018i3p304-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modal shift for New Zealand shippers for various policy scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Hyun Chan Kim
  • Diana Kusumastuti
  • Alan Nicholson

Abstract

Increasing transport problems caused by high dependency on road transport, has brought us to investigate various policy scenarios to promote a greater use of rail and coastal transport for freight transport in New Zealand. For this, we examined how factors associated with freight transport (e.g. cost and reliability) influenced the transport decisions of shippers with various operation types. Online stated preference surveys were developed and mixed-logit models were estimated from the data provided by 233 shippers. These models were used to calculate the base mode shares, and subsequently, to test various hypothetical policy options for promoting greater use of rail and coastal transport. The results show that a substantial improvement in reliability of both the rail and coastal freight transport services will lead to a substantial decline in the share of road transport, especially for shippers with short-haul and long-haul operations, transporting either large or small shipment volume.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyun Chan Kim & Diana Kusumastuti & Alan Nicholson, 2018. "Modal shift for New Zealand shippers for various policy scenarios," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 304-322, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:52:y:2018:i:3:p:304-322
    DOI: 10.1080/00779954.2017.1359659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00779954.2017.1359659
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00779954.2017.1359659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:52:y:2018:i:3:p:304-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RNZP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.