IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jpropr/v32y2015i2p147-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Client influence on valuation: valuers' motives to succumb

Author

Listed:
  • Chukwuma C. Nwuba
  • Uche S. Egwuatu
  • Babatunde M. Salawu

Abstract

Client influence has become a major concern in property valuation. Focusing on mortgage valuations, the study investigated the motives for Nigerian valuers to succumb to client influence from their own perception. A combination of cross-sectional survey and focus group research designs was adopted. A questionnaire in a 5-point Likert format was used to collect data from a sample of valuation firms and weighted mean was used to rank the variables. Descriptive statistics and one-sample t -test were employed for data analysis. The results showed that corruption and indiscipline in the society, valuers' fear of losing their clients and greed among valuers, respectively, are the strongest motives for valuers to succumb to client influence. The hypothesis tests confirmed the existence of these and other motives. The study concluded that the motives for valuers to succumb to client influence revolve around the business environment, local economic situation, ethical issues, enforcement of discipline and valuers' experience. However, there is no justification for valuers to compromise their independence and yield to client pressure to bias valuation. The findings raise questions about the quality of valuation practice in Nigeria, particularly the reliability of valuation outcomes, the credibility of valuation reports and the integrity of valuers.

Suggested Citation

  • Chukwuma C. Nwuba & Uche S. Egwuatu & Babatunde M. Salawu, 2015. "Client influence on valuation: valuers' motives to succumb," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 147-172, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:32:y:2015:i:2:p:147-172
    DOI: 10.1080/09599916.2015.1005117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09599916.2015.1005117
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09599916.2015.1005117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Małkowska & Małgorzata Uhruska & Mateusz Tomal, 2019. "Age and Experience versus Susceptibility to Client Pressure among Property Valuation Professionals—Implications for Rethinking Institutional Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Neil Crosby & Steven Devaney & Colin Lizieri & Patrick McAllister, 2018. "Can Institutional Investors Bias Real Estate Portfolio Appraisals? Evidence from the Market Downturn," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 651-667, February.
    3. Akshita Singh & Shailendra Kumar & Utkarsh Goel & Amar Johri, 2023. "Behavioural biases in real estate investment: a literature review and future research agenda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Irene Cheloti & Manya Mooya, 2021. "Valuation Problems in Developing Countries: A New Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Ogunbiyi, James O. & Adeleke, Folake & Oladimeji, Dare, 2024. "Ethical Delimitation of Client Satisfaction, Client Sophistication and Client Influence in Property Valuation Practice in Nigeria," OSF Preprints 8k43a, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:32:y:2015:i:2:p:147-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJPR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.